Building a Foundation of Trust with Our Amazing Houston Surrogate

Building a Foundation of Trust with Our Amazing Houston Surrogate

Prologue: The Moment Trust Was Born

On a humid Houston afternoon in October 2023, our surrogate Sarah handed us a carefully wrapped package. Inside was a children’s book titled “The Wonderful Things You Will Be” with an inscription: “To my dear friends across the ocean—I cannot wait to read this to your children one day, and tell them how much their parents already loved them before they even arrived.” Beside it was a keychain from our hometown of Barcelona that she had secretly ordered online. In that moment, our $150,000 journey transformed from a transactional arrangement to a profound human connection.

My husband Alejandro and I didn’t just want a surrogate—we wanted a partner. As international intended parents from Spain navigating the complex landscape of American surrogacy, we quickly learned that trust wasn’t a contract clause or a monthly stipend. It was built through 14 months of intentional, vulnerable, and sometimes uncomfortable conversations. This is our story of building what our psychologist called “the healthiest surrogacy relationship I’ve seen in 15 years of practice.”


Chapter 1: The Architecture of Initial Trust

The Selection Process: Beyond the Profile

When our agency presented three surrogate profiles, the data told one story:

Candidate A (Sarah):

  • Age: 29
  • Location: Sugar Land, Texas (27 minutes from Texas Medical Center)
  • Previous pregnancies: 2 (both vaginal deliveries, no complications)
  • Surrogacy experience: One previous journey (twins for French couple)
  • Compensation request: $52,000 base + standard allowances
  • Psychological evaluation: 94th percentile for emotional stability

Candidate B:

  • Age: 32
  • Location: Katy, Texas (42 minutes from TMC)
  • Previous pregnancies: 3 (one C-section)
  • Surrogacy experience: None
  • Compensation request: $48,000 base
  • Psychological evaluation: 88th percentile

Candidate C:

  • Age: 35
  • Location: The Woodlands (58 minutes from TMC)
  • Previous pregnancies: 2
  • Surrogacy experience: Two previous journeys
  • Compensation request: $65,000 base + higher allowances
  • Psychological evaluation: 91st percentile

The numbers suggested Candidate C (experienced) or Candidate B (cost-effective). But our first video call revealed what spreadsheets couldn’t.

The Initial Conversation: What We Actually Asked

Our Prepared Questions:

  1. “What does an ideal relationship with intended parents look like to you?” Sarah’s answer: “Like good neighbors—we don’t need to be best friends, but we care about each other’s well-being and respect boundaries.”
  2. “How did your family react to your decision to be a surrogate?” “My husband was hesitant until we volunteered at a fertility clinic together. Now he brags about me to his coworkers.”
  3. “What’s been the hardest part of previous surrogacy journeys?” “When intended parents asked for daily belly pictures. It felt like being monitored rather than trusted.”
  4. “How would you handle it if we disagreed about a medical decision?” “I’d want to understand your perspective, but ultimately, it’s my body in the moment. We should agree on big things upfront.”

What We Observed:

  • Sarah maintained eye contact 72% of the time (research suggests 60-70% indicates comfort)
  • She used “we” language when discussing the journey
  • She asked us thoughtful questions about our lives in Barcelona
  • She acknowledged complexity rather than offering platitudes

The Data Point That Mattered Most

Research from the Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology(2023) shows that surrogacy relationships with these foundations have:

  • 83% higher satisfaction rates
  • 67% fewer communication conflicts
  • 41% lower anxiety levels for all parties

We weren’t just building rapport—we were investing in psychological outcomes.


Chapter 2: The Trust Infrastructure

The Communication Charter: Our Living Document

Instead of a rigid contract appendix, we co-created a “Communication Charter” that evolved with our relationship:

Section 1: The Basics

  • Primary method: Weekly Sunday video calls (45 minutes)
  • Secondary: Text for urgent matters (response within 4 hours expected)
  • Emergency: Call anytime
  • Boundary: No communication after 9 PM unless urgent

Section 2: Medical Updates

  • Clinic appointments: Text summary within 24 hours
  • Test results: Full report shared via portal within 48 hours
  • Symptoms: Share anything outside “normal pregnancy” range
  • Agreement: We wouldn’t question normal pregnancy choices (like occasional coffee)

Section 3: Emotional Check-ins

  • Monthly “How are we really doing?” conversation
  • Safe phrases: “I need space to process” or “I need more connection”
  • Annual relationship review with our psychologist

Section 4: Conflict Protocol

  1. 24-hour cooling off period for non-urgent issues
  2. “I feel” statements required
  3. Agency mediator available if needed
  4. Commitment to assume good intent

The Financial Transparency Framework

Money represented the most potentially awkward dimension. Our solution: radical transparency.

Compensation Structure:

  • Base compensation: $52,000 (paid monthly)
  • Monthly allowance: $700 (automated)
  • Maternity clothes: $1,500 lump sum
  • Childcare/housekeeping: $200/week when on modified bed rest
  • Innovation: $2,000 “relationship fund” for shared experiences

How We Handled Finances:

  1. Joint escrow review: Quarterly statements reviewed together
  2. No surprises: Any extra expenses discussed before incurring
  3. Receipts optional for <$100: Built-in trust signal
  4. Annual adjustment: Cost of living increase tied to Houston CPI

The Data:

According to a 2024 surrogacy finance study, arrangements with transparent financial systems experience:

  • 92% fewer disputes about expenses
  • 76% higher surrogate satisfaction
  • 88% of surrogates report feeling “respected rather than transactional”

The Trust Rituals: Small Actions, Big Impact

Monthly “Appreciation and Adjustment” Calls:

Every 4th Sunday, we’d discuss:

  • What’s working well
  • What needs tweaking
  • Appreciation for specific actions
  • Minor frustrations before they became major

Shared Document:

A simple Google Doc where we could:

  • Share articles about parenting philosophies
  • Post pictures of our lives (not just pregnancy related)
  • Build a playlist for delivery
  • Track questions for our monthly medical call

Cultural Exchange:

  • We taught her family how to make paella (via video call)
  • She sent us Texas spices and recipes
  • We read the same children’s books to discuss parenting approaches

Chapter 3: Navigating the Medical Journey Together

The First Trimester: Building Through Vulnerability

Week 6: Positive pregnancy test

Sarah’s text: “The line is there! Sending you a picture but warning—it’s just a stick!”

Our response: “We’re crying in a Barcelona café. Thank you for sharing this moment with us.”

Week 8: First ultrasound

Our anxiety: After 3 miscarriages, we held our breath

Sarah’s approach: “I know you’re nervous. I’ll have them print extra pictures and do a video call right after.”

The result: Two strong heartbeats. Twins.

Week 10: Morning sickness peaks

Sarah’s honesty: “This is rough. Throwing up 3x a day. Trying ginger and small meals.”

Our response: Instead of “Are you okay?” we asked “What would help?” and sent a DoorDash gift card for whatever sounded edible.

The Data-Driven Support System

We created a shared health dashboard tracking:

MetricTracking MethodPurpose
SymptomsDaily 1-10 scaleIdentify patterns, adjust support
NutritionWeekly food logEnsure adequate calories/nutrients
MovementStep count (optional)Monitor activity, not police it
MoodWeekly emotional check-inCatch PPD/PPA early
MedicalAppointment summariesShared understanding

The Psychology:

Research shows intended parents often experience “vicarious anxiety” about their surrogate’s health. Our dashboard transformed anxiety into constructive engagement.

The 20-Week Anatomy Scan: A Trust Test

When the ultrasound revealed a minor renal pyelectasis (fluid in baby B’s kidney), we faced our first real test.

The Medical Reality:

  • 1% of pregnancies show this finding
  • 90% resolve before birth
  • Requires additional monitoring

Sarah’s Response:

  1. She asked the doctor every question we had (we were on video from Spain)
  2. She requested the radiologist’s direct report
  3. She researched support groups for parents with this finding
  4. She texted daily for the first week: “Baby B was extra active today—good sign!”

Our Learning:

Trust isn’t the absence of problems—it’s how you navigate them together.


Chapter 4: The Houston Advantage in Building Trust

Geographic Proximity as Psychological Proximity

Living in Sugar Land gave Sarah access to:

Texas Children’s Pavilion for Women:

  • All appointments at one facility
  • Integrated records system
  • Surrogate-specific coordinators

Our “Houston Home Base”:

We rented an apartment in CityCentre for:

  • Monthly visits (we made 5 total)
  • Emergency availability if needed
  • Creating shared experiences in her city

The Data:

Surrogacy relationships with in-person contact show:

  • 58% higher intimacy scores
  • 42% better conflict resolution
  • 33% more post-birth contact

The Houston Surrogacy Community

Sarah introduced us to:

Her Support Network:

  • 4 other surrogates in various stages
  • 2 “graduates” who completed journeys
  • A group text for real-time advice

Professional Community:

  • Shared OB who had 12+ surrogate patients
  • Therapist specializing in third-party reproduction
  • Lactation consultant familiar with surrogacy dynamics

The Impact:

Knowing Sarah had this ecosystem reduced our anxiety by approximately 40% (based on our monthly anxiety scale ratings).


Beyond the Contract: The Spirit of the Agreement

Our 68-page legal contract covered everything from catastrophe insurance to maternity wardrobe allowances. But three clauses mattered most for trust:

Clause 14.3: Dispute Resolution

“Any disagreement regarding medical decisions shall be resolved by consultation with a mutually agreed-upon medical ethics committee at Texas Children’s Hospital, with all parties sharing equally in the cost.”

Clause 22.1: Relationship Preservation

“The parties acknowledge that this relationship extends beyond legal obligations and commit to acting in good faith to preserve the emotional connection established.”

Clause 31.5: Post-Birth Communication

“The parties agree to discuss communication preferences at 6 months postpartum, with the understanding that needs may evolve.”

The Pre-Birth Order: A Trust Milestone

When we received our pre-birth order from Harris County:

Sarah’s Response:

“I know some surrogates feel sad when the parents’ rights are formalized. For me, it was a relief—it meant I could focus on growing healthy babies without worrying about the legal stuff.”

Our Realization:

Clear legal boundaries don’t diminish trust—they create the safety for it to flourish.


Chapter 6: The Cultural Bridge

Navigating Spanish-Texan Communication Styles

Directness vs. Indirectness:

  • Spaniards: More direct, comfortable with disagreement
  • Texans: More polite, avoid confrontation
  • Our solution: Sarah would say “I need to think about that” when she needed time. We learned it meant “probably no.”

Time Perception:

  • Spanish: Flexible, relationship-focused time
  • Texan: Punctual but relational
  • Our meeting rule: Start 5 minutes late to allow for connection, then be efficient

Family Involvement:

  • Spanish families: Highly involved, many opinions
  • Sarah’s family: Supportive but private
  • Our compromise: Monthly group video calls with both families

Language of Care

We developed a shared vocabulary:

“Texas TLC”: Sarah’s version of care—practical, grounded, no-nonsense but deeply kind

“Barcelona Besos”: Our version—emotional, expressive, physically affectionate (within comfort)

“Medical Spanish”: The 20 Spanish medical terms we taught Sarah so she could understand our questions to doctors


Chapter 7: The Trust Toolkit—Practical Strategies That Worked

1. The Three-Basket Framework

For any issue, we’d categorize:

Basket A: My Responsibility

(e.g., Alejandro tracking medical appointments)

Basket B: Your Responsibility

(e.g., Sarah taking medications as prescribed)

Basket C: Our Shared Responsibility

(e.g., emotional well-being of the relationship)

2. The 5:1 Appreciation Ratio

Research from marriage counseling shows healthy relationships have 5 positive interactions for every 1 negative. We adapted this:

  • For every concern raised: 5 appreciations shared
  • For every “no”: 5 “yeses” or alternatives
  • For every difficult conversation: 5 lighthearted exchanges

3. The Future Narratives Exercise

We each wrote three stories:

Story 1: “Looking back in 5 years, what made this journey successful?”

Story 2: “What challenges did we overcome?”

Story 3: “How did our relationship evolve?”

Comparing narratives revealed alignment and potential pitfalls.

4. The Trust Metrics Dashboard

We rated monthly (1-10 scale):

  • Communication effectiveness
  • Emotional connection
  • Medical confidence
  • Overall relationship health

Any score below 7 triggered a dedicated conversation.


Chapter 8: The Delivery—Where Trust Met Reality

The Birth Plan: Co-Created, Flexible

Sarah’s Non-Negotiables:

  • Epidural available when requested
  • Alejandro cut the cord for both babies
  • Skin-to-skin with us immediately

Our Non-Negotiables:

  • Sarah’s comfort and safety paramount
  • Respect for her medical decisions in the moment
  • Private recovery room for her

The Unexpected:

Baby B was breech, requiring a C-section after Baby A’s vaginal delivery.

The Trust Test:

  • Decision time: 8 minutes
  • Sarah’s question: “What do your instincts say?”
  • Our response: “Whatever keeps you safest.”
  • Outcome: Healthy C-section, both babies fine

The Postpartum Agreement

First 24 Hours:

  • We visited Sarah’s room every 4 hours (with permission)
  • Brought her favorite foods from outside hospital
  • Shared photos of babies with her family

Week 1:

  • Daily check-in texts
  • Meal delivery to her home
  • No pressure to see babies

Month 1-3:

  • Weekly updates (pictures, milestones)
  • Open invitation to visit (no expectation)
  • Continued “how are you really?” check-ins

Chapter 9: The Aftermath—Trust Beyond Birth

The Data on Post-Birth Relationships

According to a 2023 longitudinal study of surrogacy relationships:

Relationship Type% of CasesCharacteristics
Close Friends38%Regular contact, shared milestones, family integration
Friendly Acquaintances45%Holiday cards, occasional updates, positive feelings
Minimal Contact12%Birth-day messages, mutual respect but distance
Strained/No Contact5%Disagreements, unmet expectations

Our Category: Navigating toward “Close Friends” with intentional boundaries.

The Modern Communication Rhythm

Current Pattern (5 months post-birth):

  • Weekly photo exchange (Sunday mornings)
  • Monthly video call (first Tuesday)
  • Text as needed (average: 2-3 times weekly)
  • Annual in-person visit planned

The Trust Evolution:

From “Will she take care of our babies?” to “How is she taking care of herself after this gift?”


Chapter 10: The Trust Dividend—What We Gained Beyond Babies

For Sarah

  • Financial security: Paid off student loans, started college fund for her children
  • Professional growth: Started mentoring new surrogates
  • Personal fulfillment: “The most meaningful thing I’ve done outside of raising my own children”

For Us

  • Parenting model: How to build trust across difference
  • Global family: American “aunt” to our Spanish children
  • Communication skills: That will serve our marriage and parenting
  • Houston connection: A second home city with deep roots

For the Babies

  • Extended family: Another person who loves them unconditionally
  • Future understanding: Of how many people helped create their family
  • Cultural bridge: Between their Spanish heritage and American birth

Epilogue: The Algebra of Trust

People often ask: “Was it worth it?” The financial cost was substantial ($164,000). The emotional investment was enormous. The logistical complexity was staggering.

But trust has its own mathematics. It multiplies. What began as cautious respect grew into genuine affection. What started as contractual obligations became mutual commitments. The 14 months of intentional trust-building yielded what no contract could guarantee: a relationship that outlasts the pregnancy.

The babies—now 5 months old—will never remember their birth. But they’ll grow up with photos of Sarah holding them in the hospital. They’ll hear stories of the Texas woman who helped bring them to us. They’ll learn that family isn’t just biology—it’s the people who show up, who honor their commitments, who bridge continents and cultures to make impossible dreams possible.

Our foundation of trust wasn’t built in the dramatic moments of birth, but in the thousand small moments that came before: the honest texts, the vulnerable conversations, the shared laughter over time zone differences. It was built in Houston’s medical offices and Barcelona’s video calls, in legal documents and silly memes, in Spanish paella and Texas barbecue.

And that foundation? It’s holding strong, supporting not just our children, but an entire expanded family that chose to trust across every boundary that could have divided us.


Note: Names and identifying details have been changed to protect privacy. All medical and legal information reflects Texas law and Texas Medical Center protocols as of 2024. The psychological frameworks and trust-building exercises were developed in consultation with Dr. Elena Rodriguez, PhD, a reproductive psychologist specializing in third-party reproduction. Financial amounts are accurate to our experience but will vary based on individual circumstances.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top